Search for: "Whitman v. Burden"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
U.S.) as long as they remain nominally subordinate to the principal branches of government and as long as there is some (barely) intelligible principal (Whitman v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
LEXIS 63095 (ED VA, May 1, 2013), a Virginia federal district court rejected an inmate's attempt to have prison authorities recognize only his adopted Coptic Orthodox Christian name, and also refused to change his name on his judgment and commitment order.In Whitman v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:15 am
The current case, Murithi v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
” In the case of Jones v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
" UCS said that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
An additional forceful articulation of the right to privacy in American law is found in the 1967 Supreme Court decision in Katz v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
EPA in 1980, and the Supreme Court reaffirmed this interpretation of the Act in Whitman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:57 am
Supreme Court determined in Whitman v American Trucking that U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
”[13] McChesney and Nichols seem to be building on the approach popularized by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein in their highly influential 2008 book Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness.[14] Based on behavioral economics studies, Thaler and Sunstein argue that both government and private actors must inevitably make decisions about “choice architecture” and that, by setting defaults, incentives and rules smartly, “choice architects” can and… [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:22 am
Whitman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
Whitman, 75 N.J. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:19 am
Moreover, Judiciary Law § 487 sets forth a civil cause of action that may be established by, among other things, an attorney's intent to deceive (see Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 14 [2009]; Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP, 63 AD3d 1531, 1533 [2009]; Singer v Whitman & Ransom, 83 AD2d 862, 863 [1981]). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:31 pm
In Egyptian Goddess v. [read post]
