Search for: "Wickersham v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am
The allegation that Mid City lost the opportunity to pursue an administrative appeal, without any indication that the appeal would be successful, is insufficient to state a claim (see Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d 747, 754). [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Back in 2003 the United States Supreme Court set out to decide in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am
Defendants, citing United States v Bertie Ambulance Serv. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant for breach of contract, an account stated, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Discover Bank v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
Thus, although plaintiff raised questions of fact as to the defense, she failed to conclusively establish that the continuous representation doctrine tolled the statute of limitations (see Red Zone LLC v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 27 NY3d at 1050; Town of Amherst v Weiss, 120 AD3d 1550, 1552-1553 [2014]; Deep v Boies, 53 AD3d at 952; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bart v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
”) (emphasis added); United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:22 pm
Loree was a partner in the Litigation Departments of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP and Rosenman & Colin LLP. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:23 pm
By Eric Goldman Google, Inc v. myTriggers.com, Inc., 09 CV 14836 (Franklin County Ct. of Common Pleas, Ohio). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
Sixteen years later, in his dissent in Bush v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
See Stolt-Nielsen SA v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:32 am
“To plead a legal malpractice claim, a plaintiff must allege: (1) that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, (2) that the attorney’s breach of that duty proximately caused plaintiff to (3) sustain actual and ascertainable damages (Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY 3d 40, 49-50 [2015]). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am
Red Zone LLC v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 27 NY3d 1048, 1049-1050). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
" Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:12 am
" Howsam v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
