Search for: "Wilkens v. Wilkens"
Results 21 - 40
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 3:19 pm
**Plaintiffs’ Counsel for Class of Student Athletes Seeks Sanctions Against Late-in-the-Game Class Objectors’ Bid to Derail Settlement in Landmark NCAA College Football Case in the Northern District of California** . . . [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 11:59 am
Schneider from Fisher & Phillips LLP, as they take a look at O’Bannon v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:18 pm
The Ninth Circuit just handed down a partial victory for the NCAA in its antitrust case, O’Bannon v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Tokmenko, 112 Ohio App. 42, 43, 165 N.E2d 804 (8th Dist. 1960) (noting that receivership expenses are generally payable out of the “corpus of the property”); but see, Wilkens v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
Apple, Inc., et al, 4-13-cv-01710 (CAND June 11, 2015, Order) (Wilken, J.) [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:31 pm
O’Bannon v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:35 am
Id. at 1092 (discussing Marks v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
" Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 3:31 pm
Yesterday, Judge Wilken of the federal district court in Oakland gave final approval to settlement of Holman v Experian, Case No. 11-cv-0180 CW. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:03 am
In Dragovich v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:09 am
.'" Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:15 am
., et al v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
" Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 3:54 am
Sportcasters have discounted federal judge Claudia Wilken who decided O'Bannon v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
Judge Claudia Wilken was getting ready to enter the judgment, one of the jurors spoke up in open court and informed the Court that the verdict "WAS NOT UNANIMOUS! [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:53 pm
District Court Judge Claudia Wilken awarded Ashker v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:19 pm
Holman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:08 am
" Google Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:59 pm
In the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:31 am
Potter Voice Technologies LLC, v. [read post]
