Search for: "Wilkes v. Wilkes" Results 21 - 40 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Wilkes v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:54 am by Daily Record Staff
Estates and trusts — Personal representative — Litigation in bad faith or sans substantial justification Four months after prevailing on summary judgment, the two defendants moved for an award of their fees and expenses under Md. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:56 pm by tortsprof
The abstract provides: A case note discussing the decision of Hickinbottom J in Wilkes v DePuy International Ltd [2016] EWHC 3096 (QB); [2017] 3 All... [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:50 am by Howard Bashman
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Ilya Somin has a post titled “Thoughts on the Second Oral Argument in Knick v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm by JT
Matter of State of New York v Wilkes, 2010 NY Slip Op 07006 (4th Dept. 2010) “Insofar as respondent preserved for our review his further contention that the court erred in permitting two psychologists to testify to limited amounts of hearsay information at trial in order to explain their opinions, we conclude that [...] [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:30 am by ernst
Nicholas Sinanis, Lecturer on the Faculty of Law at Monash University, has published open access Exemplary Damages Practice in Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth-Century England in the American Journal of Legal History:A longer perspective on the modern Anglo-American law of exemplary (or punitive) damages views it as having first begun to emerge after the cases of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood were decided in 1763. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:44 am
This article examines the context and role of the concept of “civilization” as used in U.S. v Altstoetter, the 1947 trial of Nazi judges and judicial administrators at Nuremberg. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the brief: sg-invitation-brief-1.pdf An excerpt: This brief is submitted in response to the Court’s order inviting the Solicitor General to express the views of the United States. [read post]