Search for: "William D. Hawes" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 12:00 am by SOIssues
Nakanelua, 77 Haw. 499, 500, 889 P.2d 76, 77 (App. 1995). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  If only some, then there’s the additional question of how much effort the legal system should expend, or force the parties to expend, in sorting one from the other.We thought we’d explore that question today, and we start by comparing arguably the most pro-plaintiff state in the country – Idaho – on comment k issues with the most pro-defense state – California. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 283 F.3d 254, 272 n.11 (5th Cir. 2002); Williams v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Hawes, No. 06-3334 Sentence for mail fraud is vacated and remanded where the district court improperly calculated the applicable guidelines range, as defendant's conduct did not qualify for an identity theft enhancement. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm by administrator
Biggar, 716 P.2d 493 (Haw. 1986) (reversing a drug conviction initiated by an officer peering over the partition in the public bathroom to observe the defendant’s activities); State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:00 am
In 2000, I started a law firm doing plaintiffs work, which I’d decided I enjoyed most. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]