Search for: "Williams v. CCHS" Results 21 - 40 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2016, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court also found no abuse of discretion by the district court in awarding the employer costs (Williams v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming Rule 23 class certification in a dispute over whether Jani-King franchisees should have been classified as “employees” rather than independent contractors under Pennsylvania wage and hour law, the Third Circuit found that Rule 23’s commonality and predominance requirements were met because the misclassification dispute could be resolved by common evidence, including the franchise agreement, Jani-King manuals, and representative testimony (Williams v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 3:08 pm by Howard Knopf
It has been clearly very wrong ever since the Supreme Court's landmark 2004 ruling in CCH v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting her motion for partial summary judgment, the court also found that she met the definition through a record of a disability, given the many communications from medical professionals to the employer during her medical leave (Williams v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
” Thus, the court determined that the employee failed to come forward with any persuasive evidence that the employer violated the FLSA by classifying her primary duty as professional (Williams v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 6:59 am by Joy Waltemath
Those who interned on The Wendy Williams Show would receive the higher amount and all others the lower. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]