Search for: "Williams v. INDIVIDUAL JUSTICES, MAINE"
Results 21 - 40
of 307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm
William the Conquerer's heirs ruled for about 300 years, and then power shifted once again. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:28 am
Nearly 50 years ago, Justice William Brennan Jr. urged lawyers and others to look to state constitutions for more protection of individual rights than what the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Sony v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
On 19 May 2023, Mrs Justice Heather Williams handed down judgment in Prismall v Google UK Limited & Another [2023] EWHC 1169 (KB). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
See also Memorandum from William H. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:33 pm
I use a high-profile case involving ideological (and, arguably, methodological) differences among the Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices, Wisconsin Carry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
Amy Howe has the main account of the argument. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:57 am
Clean Power Ass’n v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm
And the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in Morton v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Given that I am not writing a series of full-scale articles, I fear that I cannot do justice to all of the essays (or, perhaps, to any of them), but I will try my best to focus on some of the most important themes. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
Say, for instance, that Fox, as part of its sports coverage, decides to sell video games involving the names, likenesses, and statistics of Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, Jackie Robinson, and the like. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Because policy preferences differ across states, regulating at the state level can in the aggregate satisfy more individual preferences than a uniform national law.[3] And federalism also lets states serve as "laboratories" that can experiment with various options, and show the way for other states (and perhaps for an eventual national rule).[4] A uniform national law is sometimes appropriate to implement important national values or correct various state-level pathologies. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
" Justice Barrett is right. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
”[5][6] Justice Thomas’s plurality opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
William J. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 3:26 pm
Maine, which held that states were immune from suits in state court by private individuals seeking to enforce the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
