Search for: "Williams v. Marks"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am
An accountant who has been retained to perform a “review engagement” is responsible for duties more limited in scope than an accountant hired to conduct an audit (William Iselin & Co. v Mann Judd Landau, 71 NY2d 420, 424-425 [1988]). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
The fact that Sir Mark had been buried at Sledmere in a sealed lead coffin raised the likelihood of better samples being found for the petitioner’s research. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
” [cites to Tiffany v. eBay and Multi-Time Machine v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Konin and Mark S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
District Court Judge William H. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Later the same year the even more conservative and inflexible Pierce Butler replaced the moderate William R. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
This history is analyzed in greater depth in , Soldiers on the Home Front: The Domestic Role of the American Military (2016) by William C. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
As Professor Mark W. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Again, we have come to bury Cuba's Caribbean Marxism, not to praise it (William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar Act III, scene II). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, William D. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Lochner v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, William D. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Still, the present Court, like the Taft Court, is marked by divergent approaches to proper legal interpretation. [read post]
