Search for: "Williams v. Social Security Administration" Results 21 - 40 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
President Franklin Roosevelt and the Court-Packing Fight President Roosevelt’s first term included the creation of the National Recovery Administration and the passage of Social Security; he entered a second term with a nearly unparalleled level of public support. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am by Patti Spencer
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
H.R.2128: To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of tribal governments in regard to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm by Unknown
H.R.2128: To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of tribal governments in regard to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 8:09 am by Andrew S. Williams, Esq.
Service providers for 401(k) and other retirement plans require access to personal data on participants including name, age, address, date of hire, compensation and possibly social security number to provide recordkeeping services. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Buried in the opinion, like the per curiam, is the notion that national security justifications are merely another element of administrative law, and imposed an obligation on the administrator to justify the action by reference and at a level of persuasiveness that is left to the courts. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
15 Administrability: Information asymmetries between enforcers and market participants can be especially stark in the digital economy. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Public officers and employees may engage in outside employment, aka “moonlighting,” subject to certain restrictions and limitationsKastoff v NYS Dept. of Social Services, 195 A.D.2d 808"Moonlighting" has been a common practice in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Appellant had not exhausted all administrative remedies, so the district court dismissed his complaint. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment; McLane v. [read post]