Search for: "Williams v. Superintendent"
Results 21 - 40
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 9:29 pm
This was not the intent of the former Superintendent Plunkett, who sought to insure the rights of Floyd County educators were protected. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
Commentary on the Ninth Circuit (Opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
Gelfman and Judge William V. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
Gelfman and Judge William V. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
Williams v Silverstone 2023 NY Slip Op 01917 Decided on April 12, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department is a common or varietal version of motion to dismiss decisions in legal malpractice settings. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:15 am
Failure to satisfy all the procedural mandates when filing an appeal with the Commissioner of Education is a fatal defectAppeal of Greg Johnston v the Board of Education of the Manhasset Union Free School District, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 16,184Greg Johnston alleged that Assistant to the Superintendent William Shine threatened physical violence against him during a meeting of the School Board and asked School Superintendent Charles… [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:06 am
William Rapp. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
Justice William Brennan's opinion rested on three key justifications. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
This is the rare hostile environment case does not involve explicitly-racial comments directed toward the plaintiff; rather it involves personnel actions and statements made at Housing Authority meetings.The case is Williams v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent indicates that he consented to the assignment, including the direct instruction, although he states that he “had some misgivings” about it.In September 2016, the superintendent received a complaint from a parent concerning petitioner’s refusal to allow students to bring backpacks to the classroom. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent indicates that he consented to the assignment, including the direct instruction, although he states that he “had some misgivings” about it.In September 2016, the superintendent received a complaint from a parent concerning petitioner’s refusal to allow students to bring backpacks to the classroom. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent indicates that he consented to the assignment, including the direct instruction, although he states that he “had some misgivings” about it.In September 2016, the superintendent received a complaint from a parent concerning petitioner’s refusal to allow students to bring backpacks to the classroom. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent indicates that he consented to the assignment, including the direct instruction, although he states that he “had some misgivings” about it.In September 2016, the superintendent received a complaint from a parent concerning petitioner’s refusal to allow students to bring backpacks to the classroom. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court holding that the adjudicators reviewing an ARP regime sanction (who are delegates of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) have no jurisdiction to consider the Charter: Williams v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
’`William Siegel’`Mayor’`City of Lemoore’Martin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:54 am
Educ v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:15 pm
(Dan Keating and V. [read post]
