Search for: "Williams v. The Board of Review" Results 21 - 40 of 1,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2015, 5:27 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Decisions of the Administrative Review Board May 2015   Mack Strickland, ARB No. 13-088 (ARB June 30, 2015) Decision and Order of Remand PDF Administrator, Wage and Hour Div., USDOL v. 5 Star Forestry, LLC, ARB No. 14-021, ALJ No. 2013-SCA-4 (ARB June 24, 2015) Final Decision and Order PDF Kruse v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit consisting of Judges Garland, Griffith, and Senior Judge Williams declared the Copyright Royalty Board to be unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause, and adopts a narrow fix. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- Last week, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB" or "Board") issued the first inter partes review opinion in case IPR2012-00001, Garmin USA, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:52 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, a fragmented majority of the 9th Circuit en banc dismissed an Establishment Clause challenge to a San Francisco Board of Supervisors resolution criticizing Cardinal William Levada for directing Catholic Charities to end adoption placements in same-sex households. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am by admin
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
The Federal Circuit just recently concluded its review of these cases, affirming the decision of the Board. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:26 pm by Ilya Somin
In a recent symposium on Nancy MacLean’s book Democracy in Chains, Duke economist William Darity tries to defend her claim that Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- "It appears to me that en banc consideration is warranted. [read post]
The Federal Circuit held, however, that AAPA can be permissible in assessing whether the patent’s claims would have been obvious in an inter partes review proceeding as an admission in a patent’s specification, and remanded to the Board on that issue (Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 10:50 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
  The Law Review of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. [read post]