Search for: "Williams v. United States Post Office" Results 21 - 40 of 1,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Since the early 1930s – when theorists in the United States began arguing over the corporate objective – legal restrictions and requirements have dramatically limited those choices, largely for the benefit of stakeholders who are not shareholders. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Essay reveals the intersection of the Court’s pretext and excessive force doctrines by unearthing their shared roots in the 1973 United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Alessandro Maurini, The Missed Revolution at the Origins of the United States (2022). 6. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Worley have posted Evidence that the President is an "Officer of the United States" for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”) Florence Kelley didn’t think you had to squint to notice the enduringly unequal status of women in the United States in 1923. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
In this post, I outline some of the reasons why, drawing upon research that I have pursued for many years on the Officers of the United States to which the Necessary and Proper Clause refers. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
 This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
 This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
” There is debate over “officer of the United States” and “Term Limits,” which the chief justice asks Mitchell to clarify that he’s referring to a 1995 Supreme Court decision, U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]