Search for: "Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2011, 1:37 am
According to one report, in the weeks following the decision, more than 20 such actions were filed against retailers including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corporation, Coach Inc., Nordstrom Inc., Macy’s Inc. and Best Buy Co. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Wal-Mart, Inc., 222 F.R.D. 137, 184-185 (N.D. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:48 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 245 F.R.D. 358, 376 (E.D. [read post]
28 May 2007, 11:26 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 605 F.2d 1155, 1159 (10th Cir.1979) (same); Williams v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:38 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 708 So.2d 362 (La. 1998). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
Specifically, the citation stated: The officer named below has probable cause to believe that on or about Saturday, the 06 day of September, 2014, at 03:08 PM in the county named above you did unlawfully and willfully STEAL, TAKE, AND CARRY AWAY (ACNE TONER AND TOWELETTES), THE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF (WAL-MART STORES INC. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:12 pm
Landrum v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
May 18, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Serial No. 86651975 [Section 2(d) refusal of GEORGE for "watches, clocks, jewellery and imitation jewellery" in view of the identical mark registered for "pet collar medallions and charms"]. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Levinnstim v Parker, 27 AD3d 698; see also Molina v State of New York, 46 AD3d 642; Williams v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 10 AD3d 653). [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 9:02 am
Wal-Mart, Inc., Case Nos. 04-16688 and 04-16720, 2007 U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 9:02 am
Wal-Mart, Inc., Case Nos. 04-16688 and 04-16720, 2007 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214, 1241 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm
In Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Scott, 13-899, involves the discount store’s efforts to argue that under Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 504 F.Supp.2d 939, 947 (S.D.Cal.2007) (noting split of authority but finding that, with recent Proposition 64 reforms, the UCL now requires reliance); Anunziato v. eMachines, Inc., 402 F.Supp.2d 1133, 1137-39 (C.D.Cal.2005) (declining to read a reliance requirement into the UCL); In re Tobacco II Cases, 146 P.3d 1250 (2006) (granting petition for review on issue of whether UCL requires reliance); Def.'s Opp'n n.… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Williams v. [read post]
