Search for: "Williamson v. Harris"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Harry M. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
"Buttigieg does not get another chance at that, because Marianne Williamson — of all people — breaks in. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania 17-647 Issues: (1) Whether the Supreme Court should reconsider the portion of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Aug. 23, 1999) (“plaintiff has not produced evidence of an alternative design”; “testimony goes to an alternative treatment [is] not an alternative design”); Harris v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:55 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Verizon New York, Inc. 14-439Issue: (1) Whether the exhaustion requirements of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, 17-647 Issues: (1) Whether the Supreme Court should reconsider the portion of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
William Leonard recently wrote: “Former President Harry Truman himself wrote in his memoirs that the Vice President ‘is not an officer of the executive branch. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
Williamson, 101 Ark. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Roe and Harris v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Roe and Harris v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
