Search for: "Winder v. Winder"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 4:44 am
Winder a few days ago. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:30 am
À.R.L. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:13 pm
The public law defence This is discussed solely in terms that a decision to bring a possession claim by a public authority is, in the circumstances, something no reasonable person could consider justifiable, following Wandsworth BC v Winder [1985] AC 461. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
From that small seed, it was argued by Hounslow, Leeds and Manchester that a gateway (b) defence is not open to a Defendant at all in the county court and, in the alternative, Wandsworth LBC v Winder [1985] AC 461, properly analysed, only gives rights to defend private rights using public law. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
From that small seed, it was argued by Hounslow, Leeds and Manchester that a gateway (b) defence is not open to a Defendant at all in the county court and, in the alternative, Wandsworth LBC v Winder [1985] AC 461, properly analysed, only gives rights to defend private rights using public law. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:19 am
In this week’s case (E.B. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
The position was: (a) that public law defences based on the alleged irrationality of a decision to seek possession could be raised as a defence in the county court - Wandsworth LBC v Winder [1985] AC 461 (b) that Article 8 could not be relied upon to defeat a proprietary or contractual right to possession - Harrow BC v Qazi [2004] 1 AC 983 (c) that decision had been doubted by the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Connors v UK [2005] 40 EHRR 185… [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:37 am
Winder v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:15 pm
The Order was entered in the case of Bank of America v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 8:49 am
For example, Mull v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was no infringement of her existing rights (Wandsworth v Winder [1985] AC 461) as the right was to an AST, not an assured tenancy. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was no infringement of her existing rights (Wandsworth v Winder [1985] AC 461) as the right was to an AST, not an assured tenancy. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:18 pm
The case is Missouri v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:37 am
Winder v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
" Just a guess on my part, but maybe it had something to do with Ford inviting himself into Scruggs' attorney fees -- as alleged in the Jones v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 8:21 am
We have been through several AI winders. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Her word was law, since prior to the Supreme Court's opinion in Kent v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 12:52 pm
Each of the representative plaintiffs raised claims based on the tort of intrusion upon seclusion that was first recognized by the Court of Appeal in Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
