Search for: "Wise v. The Department of Employment Security"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 11:51 am
State Privacy Laws The TDPSA is based on VCDPA but departs from it in several key provisions, as we note below: 1. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
In Konop v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:00 pm
State Privacy Laws The TDPSA is based on VCDPA but departs from it in several key provisions, as we note below: 1. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
It did not take long after Justice Antonin Scalia’s unexpected passing for someone to attack him for having authored Employment Div. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 1:35 pm
” Van Buren v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
Certainly, the $2.75 million settlement amount reaffirms that covered entities and their business associates risk substantial liability for failing to properly assess and protect the security of ePHI in accordance with HIPAA’s Privacy and Security Rule. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
No form is more clearly earned by the recipient, who, together with his employer, contributes to the Social Security fund during the years of his employment. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm
In situations where the putative class size is close to 40 members but short of that baseline, and hence numerosity may be in question, employers would be wise to consider citing the Court’s scrutiny here of Plaintiffs’ declaration testimony. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Barbara McQuade and Chuck Rosenberg discussed the Justice Department’s inconsistent views on materiality in prosecutions evidenced by the department’s actions in the Michael Flynn and Kevin Clinesmith cases. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 11:31 am
The Court held that the list was non-exhaustive, and remanded to the Employment Security Department to “determine, based upon the individual facts of the case . . . whether these employees had good cause to leave their jobs. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:43 pm
Kegel v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:23 am
Wise to take the computer, and lock it in the trunk of his car where it would be secured for the weekend.The following Monday morning, Larry Wise took the computer to the Shelby Police Department and turned it over to Sergeant David Mack, who was assigned to conduct the investigation. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:00 pm
DAPA would have permitted those parents to seek, and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials to grant, “deferred action”—a temporary but renewable reprieve from removal from the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Scheinkman (pictured) in Perry v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Scheinkman (pictured) in Perry v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
Maxwell, an employee of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), assisted [Laiwala] by processing false DMV test scores, and Howard assisted in obtaining false Social Security numbers.People v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
A D.C. district court decision, Olsen v. [read post]
