Search for: "Woods v. Poor*" Results 21 - 40 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Ms Wood also criticised the cost of privacy orders as she says that only the wealthy can afford protection. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:12 am by Christine Sellers
The following is a guest post by Margaret Wood, Legal Reference Specialist in our Public Services Division. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Although the Community failed to raise Alvarez’s lack of direct appeal in its motion to dismiss, the panel considered the defense under Wood v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:09 am
Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the death sentence, ruling that Wood had failed to show that the lawyers was unconstitutionally ineffective.The Alabama case is Wood v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:45 am by Steve Hall
The Court this morning ruled against an Alabama death row inmate in Wood v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm by INFORRM
The decision in Prior v QUT was not entirely surprising in light of the facts and the law. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Wood, 717 S.W.2d 837 (Ky. 1986) (teachers smoked marijuana off campus with two 15-year-old students); Board of Educ. of Laurel County v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
.* I financed it so it's my copyright--well, not reallyKat friend Aaron Wood has provided an edifying summary of a recent case from the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, Henry Hadaway Organisation v Pickwick Group Limited and Ors [2015] EWHC 3407 (IPEC), concerning the vexing question that copyright practitioners know all too well: Who is the owner of the copyright in a recording where one party finances and the other is the creative/organiser? [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:08 pm
" Maybe Moreno will be nominated if the five others promise to overrule Roe v. [read post]