Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 am
He then draws attention to a wider and vaguer class of persons who (in Lord Woolf’s words)“hold a position where higher standards of conduct can be rightly expected by the public”. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:53 am
They had no option but to appeal.The House of Lords have now found in their favour, finding a slightly different way of interpreting the wording of the review clause. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:08 am
Lord Lester’s much heralded Defamation Bill (see our earlier post) has been published today. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:03 pm
In a case in which a book of meaningless code words was protected (Reiss v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Five Justices of the Court will hear the arguments and determine the question; Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
The House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 explained why English law should adopt a different approach. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
As predicted by various commentators giving a preview of the case (including in my previous post), the five Supreme Court judges (Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs) clarified the applicable law, but unanimously dismissed the appeals against the Court of Appeal decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) on the facts. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
What isn’t at all clear is what form of words will count as a proleptic discharge. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
There is perhaps a note of relief in Lord Sumption’s judgmen [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
KS v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1756 (23 July 2010) – Read judgment J, S, M v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1755 – Read judgment The Lord Chief Justice has emphasised in two Court of Appeal judgments that the jury-less trials must be a last resort and take place only in truly extreme cases. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 8:34 am
The case is Xodus v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
I’m not going to go into great detail on the five separate judgments from the House of Lords in LB Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, but I do want to look at where it leaves us and what the problems are with the judgments. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
I’m not going to go into great detail on the five separate judgments from the House of Lords in LB Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, but I do want to look at where it leaves us and what the problems are with the judgments. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:17 am
I went to a German course on Word for Windows, since when I have often muttered to myself Vörtt. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
The exception to the rule was the "private dictionary" principle where both parties used particular words in an unconventional sense (not applicable in this case). [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 7:17 am
In 1990, the Second Circuit in Bellefonte Reinsurance Co. v. [read post]
