Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
Crude oil contains metals such as Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Nickel (Ni), and Vanadium (V). [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
We consider that this simply means that the word ‘poppadom’ is not a protected term. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
Dávila v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:11 am
On 18 December 2023, Vatican News announced Doctrinal declaration opens possibility to bless couples in irregular situations, following the publication of the Declaration “Fiducia supplicans” which was issued by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) and approved by Pope Francis. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Lord and undeposable ruler, perfection in the house of wisdom, Lord infinite in knowledge, we who fail to know you fully will fail, if we could but know you fully, all would be well with us.] [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am
by Dennis Crouch Thaler v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
Lord Justice Warby went on to apply the ‘ordinary and natural meaning’ of s 3 to the facts of the case, and concluded that the publication of the words and email satisfied the requirements of the section. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Sattva Capital Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The scope of the rules on concealed fraud were reviewed in the Report of the Law Revision Committee of 1934, following which the Limitation Act 1939 (“LA 1939”), s 26 introduced express wording on the “postponement of limitation period in case of fraud or mistake”. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Particular care is required before deploying it, as Lord Sales’s analysis in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon [2023] UKSC 45 amply demonstrates. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In other words kids, talk the talk, then screw your country, and if anyone complains tell them to suck it up“.. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Lidl’s logo wins without a word: the year’s most controversial judgment? [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Tom Bingham, in his book “The Rule of Law”, while explaining the rule of fair trial cited a House of Lords’s case “Regina v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” At paragraph 21, Lord Sumption continued:- “…The judge’s finding was based on a combination of the meaning of the words, the situation of Mr Lachaux, the circumstances of publication and the inherent probabilities. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm
, which prompted lower-level noblemen and lords to more or less force the king, under threat of war, into signing what was essentially a declaration of rights and an admission to the limits of his own power. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
They advocated consistent word use, brevity, and short sentences in the active voice and present tense; they admonished the use of legalistic words and provisos. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
