Search for: "Working v. Black "
Results 21 - 40
of 5,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” Daniels described feeling “blacked out,” though she was not drunk or drugged. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
The Acts: (1) make it easier and less costly for businesses to establish and administer retirement savings plans; (2) require new 401(k) plans to have automatic enrollment features; (3) render long-term, part-time workers (i.e. those that worked 500 or more hours over two consecutive years) eligible to participate in their employer’s retirement plan; (4) allow employers to provide de minimis financial incentives to induce employees to participate in the employer’s plan;… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
In the year after Plessy v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
The ALJ, who worked within the Drug Enforcement Administration, concluded that marijuana should be rescheduled. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
HR6090, which passed the House of Representatives Wednesday by a 320-91 vote, would provide, in relevant part, For purposes of this Act, the term "definition of antisemitism"— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance], of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the "[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism"… [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Black Law you will receive personalized legal services. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
