Search for: "Wraggs v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:58 am
Wragge & Co.'s particular take on the case can be read here. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm
We have had 450,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and the Philippines making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
Ansari v Amini, heard 10 and 11 November 2020 (Julian Knowles J) This Round Up was compiled by Colette Allen who is the host of Newscast on Dr Thomas Bennett and Professor Paul Wragg’s The Media Law Podcast (@MediaLawPodcast). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
United States X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a federal defamat [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
We had a post by Paul Wragg suggesting that action could be brought against him. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
The question in Hermès v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am
” Hacked Off has an article covering the Independent Press Recognition Panel’s sixth Annual State of Recognition Report, which was highly critical of the industry-controlled press complaints handler, IPSO. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
Cadwalladr stated that she did not intend to convey that meaning, and therefore dropped her truth defence and relied solely on a public interest defence at trial. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
They state it is “unacceptable to violate fundamental human and consumer rights in an attempt at serving more relevant ads. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
