Search for: "Wray v Wray"
Results 21 - 40
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2018, 8:30 am
In the recent case (Lapshinoff v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am
Goldsmith praised Wray as “smart, serious, and professional,” and Chris Mirasola provided a more detailed background on Wray’s past experience. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:14 am
Ford Motor Co., Graves v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
Jordan Brunner and Emma Kohse provided a detailed overview of Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:17 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RMM v HW & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1467 (17 December 2010) Quinn v CC Automotive Group Ltd (t/a Carcraft) [2010] EWCA Civ 1412 (16 December 2010) Warren v Calzaghe [2010] EWCA Civ 1447 (16 December 2010) Southern Cross Healthcare Co Ltd v Perkins & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1442 (16 December 2010) Benedetti v Sawiris & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1427 (16 December 2010) Revenue and Customs v Blue Sphere Global Ltd… [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:21 am
Grayson Clary summarized the Fourth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:03 am
Sarah Grant summarized the oral argument in Force v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Without the Zeran v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
The case, Apple v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:17 am
" To establish causation, "a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer's negligence" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Kuzmin v Nevsky, 74 AD3d at 898; Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d 453; Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329; Carrasco v Pena & Kahn, 48 AD3d… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
” Wray v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:14 am
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the attorney’s negligence” (Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329; see Ferrigno [*2]v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d at 652; Marino v Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salibury & Cambria, LLP, 87 AD3d 566). [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
To establish proximate causation, the plaintiff must show that she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the defendant attorney’s [*2]negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Kluczka v Lecci, 63 AD3d 796, 797; Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:16 pm
Plaintiff could not establish the important but/for causation - that, but for the attorney's negligence the plaintiff would have prevailed in the underlying lawsuit.As the Court noted:To establish the element of causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Saver, 8 NY3d at 442; Kluczka v Lecci, 63… [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
United States and Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:01 am
Wray State Bank (In re Kerst), 347 B.R. 418, 422 (Bankr.D.Colo.2006); Gold v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:05 am
Wray (Dare)(Jolly): Derivative action by condominium homeowners association asserting claims for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm
Despite the conclusion of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz that the FBI’s initiation of the Russia probe met legal standards, the report issued Monday by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) strongly criticized the FBI’s handling of one aspect of the probe: the request for a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) wiretap of ex-Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page and subsequent renewals of the FISA. [read post]