Search for: "Wray v. AT"
Results 21 - 40
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
United States in the Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am
Goldsmith praised Wray as “smart, serious, and professional,” and Chris Mirasola provided a more detailed background on Wray’s past experience. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:14 am
Ford Motor Co., Graves v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:17 am
" To establish causation, "a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer's negligence" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Kuzmin v Nevsky, 74 AD3d at 898; Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d 453; Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329; Carrasco v Pena & Kahn, 48 AD3d… [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
” Wray v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:30 am
In the recent case (Lapshinoff v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:14 am
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the attorney’s negligence” (Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329; see Ferrigno [*2]v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d at 652; Marino v Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salibury & Cambria, LLP, 87 AD3d 566). [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
To establish proximate causation, the plaintiff must show that she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the defendant attorney’s [*2]negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Kluczka v Lecci, 63 AD3d 796, 797; Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:16 pm
Plaintiff could not establish the important but/for causation - that, but for the attorney's negligence the plaintiff would have prevailed in the underlying lawsuit.As the Court noted:To establish the element of causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Saver, 8 NY3d at 442; Kluczka v Lecci, 63… [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:03 am
Sarah Grant summarized the oral argument in Force v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
Jordan Brunner and Emma Kohse provided a detailed overview of Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
In Moore v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:21 am
Grayson Clary summarized the Fourth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
Sims, Harper v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Without the Zeran v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
The case, Apple v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:01 am
Wray State Bank (In re Kerst), 347 B.R. 418, 422 (Bankr.D.Colo.2006); Gold v. [read post]