Search for: "Wright v. Sellers" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2023, 7:08 am by Eric Goldman
UMG Recordings, Inc., 2022 WL 17744001 (SDNY Aug. 16, 2022). 512(f) plaintiff alleged claims sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss. * Wright v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am by Eric
July 17, 2012) [Eric's Note: Sam Bayard is an associate at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in New York. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 “Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 7:34 am
A plaintiff must show the product was defective when the seller sold it. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 16 and 18 February 2021 Julian Knowles J heard a PTR in the case of Wright v McCormack. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and… [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), rather than Strickland v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by Douglas Reiser
  Louisiana’s R.S. 9:4814(A) provides recovery only to “laborers” and “sellers of movables” (sellers of goods/materials). [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 7:00 am by Vince Sliwoski
As the Oregon Supreme Court held in State ex rel Oregon State Bar v. [read post]