Search for: "Yamashita" Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 12:10 am
Tomoko Yamashita, Responsibility to Protect as a Basis for ‘Judicial Humanitarian Intervention’ Lenneke Sprik, Military Commanders as Bystanders to International Crimes: A Responsibility to Protect? [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Helen Klein
In re Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1, 9 (1946) (“[T]he Executive branch of the government could not, unless there was suspension of the writ, withdraw from the courts the duty and power to make such inquiry into the authority of the commission as may be made by habeas corpus. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:14 pm
Contents include:ArticlesRoda Mushkat, The Intricacies of Implementing International Law: A Juxtaposition of Theories with the Actualities of the Sino-British Declaration Regarding the Future of Hong KongErik Franckx & Marco Benatar, The “Duty” to Co-Operate for States Bordering Enclosed or Semi-Enclosed SeasIrena Ilieva, Countering Terrorism and Protecting Human Rights: An Asian International Legal DimensionBjörn Ahl, Treaty Making by the Chinese Central Government and the… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:29 pm
This book analyzes fourteen high-profile American, Australian, British, and Philippine trials, including the two subsequent proceedings at Tokyo and the Yamashita trial. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm by Jane Chong
Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763, 786-87 (1950); In re Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1, 14 (1946); Quirin, 317 U.S. at 43. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:14 pm
In 2001, the Washington Supreme Court admitted Takuji Yamashita, a Japanese immigrant who had been refused admission to the profession in 1902. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Ryan, Yamashita's Ghost: War Crimes, MacArthur's Justice, and Command Accountability (2012), and Charles Anthony Smith, The Rise and Fall of War Crimes Trials: From Charles I to Bush II (2012). [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:36 am by Steve Vladeck
As cases in point, every significant Supreme Court military commission decision—Milligan, Quirin, Yamashita, Eisentrager, Madsen, even Hamdan I—got to the Court through habeas. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:00 pm by David Glazier
Moreover, the three Supreme Court cases regularly relied upon by military commission proponents – Quirin, Yamashita, and Eisentrager – each upheld military jurisdiction only after finding that at least one charge actually stated a violation of international law. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 6:43 am by Jon Gelman
Those were the words of Kazuhiko Yamashita, executive-level fellow for Fukushima plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company when he was pressed by the opposition Democratic Party of Japan. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:35 pm by Sandy Levinson
  (There is something particularly indecent about the Obama Administration claiming that Commanders-in-Chief must be held responsible per se, a reversion, it appears to the Yamashita doctrine right after World War II. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:11 am by Peter Margulies
Steve believes that informality is a recipe for Yamashita redux. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
As the Supreme Court explained in In re Yamashita, “charges of violations of the law of war triable before a military tribunal need not be stated with the precision of a common law indictment. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Here’s the speech: Farley argues that “I think it’s fair to say that there’s a lotta Yamashita Doctrine stuff going on here”: Hal is using the threat of brutal depredation to in order to coerce the surrender of the city, which continues to have the capacity to resist. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Ryan’s Yamashita’s Ghost: War Crimes, MacArthur’s Justice, and Command Accountability (University Press of Kansas, 2012), which is forthcoming in Law and Politics Book Review (January 2013). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 10:36 pm by Jon Gelman
Bumaschny, Miho Yamashita, Rodrigo Casas-Cordero,Verónica Otero-Corchón, Flávio S.J. de Souza, Marcelo Rubinstein andMalcolm J. [read post]