Search for: "Yorker v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2019, 6:03 am by Howard Bashman
“The Abortion Fight and the Pretense of Precedent: State legislators have proposed Draconian new laws on the assumption that, when they come before the Supreme Court, they will be used to vanquish Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:00 am
(Since that last claim wasn’t “cognizable as a matter of law,” the AD2 declined to revive it.)I guess they couldn’t have stated it any better.# # #DECISIONK.W. v State of New York# # #COMMENTARY: We believe it's shameful, and hypocritical, that the Attorney General's Office is taking a hard-line position in these cases.In a statement issued on January 28, 2019, in response to the passage of the Child Victims Act, New York State… [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It certifies the issue to the State Court of Appeals for a definitive answer.The case is Schoenefeld v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Andrew Hamm
Previously, taxpayers could deduct all or nearly all state and local taxes — and in 2015, the average deduction for state and local taxes claimed by the 3.3 million New Yorkers who itemized their deductions on their federal tax returns was $21,943. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:56 am by lennyesq
McGuire, executive director of the group and a resident of upstate Livingston County, where New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
At ThinkProgress, Bryce Covert reports that forty-three “sexual harassment cases have been dismissed” in the wake of Vance v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:15 am by EEM
Trump before the  of travel ban case in 4th Circuit Court of Appeals:"The Fourth Circuit Examines Trump's Travel-ban Motives," New Yorker, 9 May 2017 [text]IRAP v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
In The Dark Side of Defamation Law, a featured review in the New Yorker, Jeannie Suk Gersen reviews Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 7:05 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The New Yorker – “When the current Supreme Court issued its ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:00 am by EEM
News:Some commentary on and analysis of oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 12:58 pm
Refunds may be available as a result of the recent United States Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]