Search for: "Young et al v. Trump et al"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
CalPERS, et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the… [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
”[6] What about Plessey v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
MenellPerfect storm: digital age, Napster, increased statutory damages; RIAA et al. ended up targeting individual users. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
President Trump signed a revised executive order restricting entry into the United States from six majority-Muslim nations this morning. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Gomez, et al., 136 S. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 7:46 am
Citigroup Technology, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
New Jersey, et al.. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:41 am
While Planned Parenthood’s indiscretions have undoubtedly hurt a multitude of young girls, the court in Roe et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
