Search for: "Young v. Cruz"
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
The Leftmost City: Power and Progressive Politics in Santa Cruz (Westview Press, 2009).Hine, Robert V. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Post-mortem moral rights in PolandMoral rights are back on stage again as Jeremy gives the floor to Katfriend and enthusiastic young lawyer Ewa Laskowska. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
The statute is broad in scope and is not limited to protection against the perpetration of sex crime offenses upon children but in fact extends "to other dangers as well" (id.; see also People v Cruz, 152 Misc 2d 436, 438-439 [1991]). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hansen Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Knick v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
Specifically, in 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Miller v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
A display of photos of Andy Warhol as a boy and young man. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:38 am
Cruz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
In a recent case, EEOC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:44 pm
He also proudly proclaims his identity as a democratic socialist and his esteem for Eugene V. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:59 am
Supreme Court this week, Rent-a-Center v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
That means it is unconstitutional, whether or not Roe v Wade is re-engineered or overruled.This revolting endangerment of young girls’ lives is particularly troubling when considering the irrational measures taken by Texas officials in dealing with COVID-19, which as of last month included Governor Abbott’s executive order banning the use of vaccine mandates in the public sector and Senator Ted Cruz’s proposed federal legislation banning mask mandates,… [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Board overruled Plessy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 6:42 am
In this newest culture wars case, Young America's Foundation v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
