Search for: "Young v. State of California" Results 21 - 40 of 1,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:15 am
In fact, the plaintiff brought his claims under the state-securities laws of  Massachusetts, Colorado, Illinois, and California. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
   How one state's 2008 law has effectively curbed how face recognition technology is used there, perhaps creating a model for other states or Congress to follow. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Last year, Mendocino County in California repealed its policy of charging illegal public records fees after local journalists and activists used The Foilies’ "The Transparency Tax Award" in their advocacy against the rule. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
"I'm confident that there are many appellate judges (both state and federal), in California and elsewhere, who would have found these interactions entirely consensual, even today.But I also think there's an increasing number who would agree with Justice Moor. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
Clark, 288 Mo. 659, 232 S.W. 1031, 1035 (Mo banc. 1921), overruled by Younge v. [read post]