Search for: "Youngblood v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2016, 10:30 am
In Youngblood v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:18 am
Youngblood v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:23 am
Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 1:31 am
In Youngblood, the Supreme Court held that the state does not have a duty to preserve physical evidence of a crime. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 5:39 pm
Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (1984), Youngblood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:21 pm
Estate of Youngblood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:21 pm
Estate of Youngblood v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:02 am
Tennessee has embraced this principle in State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am
Youngblood, in which it held that police have no duty to preserve potentially useful evidence. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
" The United States Supreme Court has defined an ex post facto law as one which "punishes as a crime an act previously committed, which was innocent when done, which makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission, or which deprives one charged with sex crimes of any defense available according to law at the time when the act was committed as held in Collins v Youngblood and Beazell v Ohio. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:02 am
Next post: Which states apply Duhig? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:23 am
The State countered that, under the United States Supreme Court's holding in Youngblood v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
Trombetta-Youngblood Motions for sanctions for the destruction of favorable evidence, (see California v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:32 am
Clarifying the holding in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 10:44 am
(A shame that they forget to add the button that preserves exculpatoryevidence).United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
In Youngblood v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 10:41 am
And Gall v. [read post]
