Search for: "Younge v Patel"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
States Power Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
Sept. 16, 2010) (Patel, J.) [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:29 pm
Young also invoked Judge Patel's troubling opinion in NFB v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
"The Cooking Channel is for those mildly ashamed to call themselves 'foodies'" http://j.mp/bLHsNZ slate lists "Ten movies that never should have been made—and thankfully weren't" http://j.mp/bcPgBK how young is too young? [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Patel v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 7:12 am
Young lawyers should have the opportunity to understand transparency v. translucency. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
" Then, Young shot Patel several times after Patel had moved off screen. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
Sure enough, the docket in that case, Jones Day v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
Young Again Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 12:06 am
" In Young v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 11:07 am
It is about a young federal public defender handling a case, United States v. [read post]
