Search for: "Zale v. Zale"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2009, 10:05 am
The September 16 opinion in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:33 pm
In the recent decision of In re Zale Corporation Stockholders Litigation, C.A. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:56 pm
” The appeals court had held that the class action waiver in the wireless service agreement was unconscionable under the law of California.In Discover Bank v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:30 am
Ferguson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:43 am
Johnson’s contention, the suit was not about the consumer's general purchasing habits.The February 18 opinion in Koh v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm
The statute did not state that the threat of class action must be set forth, according to the court.Dismissal of the CLRA claims was affirmed in two of the actions on appeal in which the proposed class of ticket purchasers was so broadly defined that material misrepresentations to the whole class could not be shown.The August 22 opinion in Stearns v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:23 pm
Snapple Purchasers’ “All Natural” Claims Meet Fraud Pleading StandardsThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Purchasers of Snapple drink products pleaded with particularity that “all natural” labeling of beverages containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was deceptive and fraudulent under California consumer protection laws, the federal district court in Sacramento has ruled.The purchasers' broader allegations… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
In Koh, a household cleaning product label made express representations of environmental superiority, used the trademarked name “Greenlist,” a name not immediately apt to be associated with the product or its manufacturers, and identified the name as a rating system, which further suggested an independent source that rated other manufacturers’ products as well.The May 26 opinion in Hill v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Labeling Puerto Rican Rum as “Havana Club” Not False AdvertisingThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.A liquor distributor (Bacardi U.S.A.) did not engage in false advertising under the Lanham Act by labeling a rum not produced in Cuba as “Havana Club,” the U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:15 am
The July 12 opinion in Bluestar Management LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:04 am
The opinion in Smajlaj v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:45 am
So the attorney was liable for every fax received regardless of whether he had an established business relationship with any of the recipients, the court concluded.The August 3 opinion in Holtzman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
Claims under the New York deceptive acts and practices statute were rejected because none of the plaintiffs took classes in New York.PufferyThe court agreed with Trump’s contention that his alleged statement “no course offers the same depth of insight, experience and support as the one bearing my name” constituted mere puffery and thus could not support claims under the UCL or CLRA.The May 16 opinions in Makaeff v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:55 am
Keyword suggestion, however, was a “neutral tool” that did nothing more than provide options that advertisers could adopt or reject, in the court's view.The opinion in Jurin v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
Quiznos' contention that the posting of the videos did not constitute commercial speech for the purpose of influencing customer to buy Quiznos' products was unpersuasive, according to the court.The opinion, Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:35 am
The December 1 order in PBM Products, LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:26 pm
If discovery indicates that some of Carter's Reed's claims for Relacore were scientifically sound, then the trial court would have options including subdividing, or in a worst-case scenario, decertifying the class.The burden would be on the plaintiff to provide the necessary evidence to support the allegations that justified the grant of class certification, the court observed.The September 29 opinion in Lee v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:51 am
Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 pm
However, what LFP believed at the time of publication was a question for the jury, the court concluded.The November 23 opinion in Toffoloni v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
The Texas Attorney General’s November 2010 Comptroller of Public Accounts Case List and Summary of Issues (updated through December 29, 2010), published at the end of December, mentioned the sales tax refund lawsuit of Zale Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
