Search for: "Zornes v. Zornes"
Results 21 - 26
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
The “continuous representation doctrine tolls the statute of limitations … where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” (Zorn v Gilbert, 8 NY3d 933, 934 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]; see also Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 167-168 [2001J). [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:14 pm
Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
“The continuous representation doctrine tolls the statute of limitations where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” (Zorn v Gilbert, 8 NY3d at 934 [internal quotation marks, ellipsis and citations omitted]). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 11:40 pm
By Nicole KilloranState v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
…and you’ll get something like today’s opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm
Rescheduling Recommendation, 2024 FDA’s 2023 analysis and recommendation finally came to light when Texas attorney Matt Zorn posted it on his website a week ago. [read post]
