Search for: "c/o B. Strong"
Results 21 - 40
of 598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
The public health argument was a little weaker b/c drug was relatively safe, and the evidence was strong. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Belmora just deepened his confusion, b/c put UC up against territoriality.Does it make sense to have a category of broad protection/injunctive relief for TMs? [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
I always like to teach with Lollipops and Jellybeans for skate rinks: similarity confusing, but one reason is b/c the mark is conceptually strong for skate rinks but lacked marketplace strength. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:59 am
O que é de domínio público é que o fundamento básico das relações sociais está na relação entre o indivíduo e o ambiente social. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
The opposition under ss. (5)(2)(b) and 3(6) failed. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Marks are getting longer over time b/c more is taken. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
One showing her w/spinal injury was taken down b/c of takedown from Frida Kahlo rights-claiming company. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 8:12 am
(Panel of Chief Judge Prost with Judges Plager and O’Malley). [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) With this post Flora Sapio and I (and friends from time to time) continue an experiment in collaborative dialogue. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:52 am
Also yellowReferring in much detail to the CJEU’s recent decisions in the Specsavers(C-252/12) and the Oberbank and Santander cases (joined cases C-217/13, C-218/13), the BGH found a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Useful illustration b/c Fed. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 12:50 pm
Years later, CAFC invalidates the claim b/c the specification shows no injector w/o a pressure jacket. 9 years of litigation to get the right claim interpretation only to have that interpretation invalidate the claim. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
Maybe b/c it makes market work better—allocative efficiency. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am
Abramowicz: Akamai: no inducement w/o primary infringement. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
Logs not admissible b/c of Rule 412, so not subject to Brady. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:53 am
§ 1125(c). [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:35 pm
Cf. the Texas statute §153.502(a), -(b), and -(c) with the uniform law §7. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:00 am
The application was opposed under sections 3(1)(b), 3(1)(c) and 3(1)(d) Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Derclaye: should abolish the Community unregistered design right b/c © does the trick. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
Project engages w/2 debates: relationship b/t registration and use, b/c this problem is most acute when the registration’s scope doesn’t come close to the actual scope. [read post]
