Search for: "kitto"
Results 21 - 22
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
The answer to that question requires an understanding of the “purpose and nature” of the impugned use: Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 407 at 426(the Shell case) per Kitto J. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 6:50 am
Not sure if he is talking about Mark Kitto, but I suspect so. [read post]
