Search for: "v. Java City"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
Shum v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
., L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/AY7OjgWhHX -> Smartphone Evidence: R. v Avanes Et Al. https://t.co/ztNEbltjSX -> Goldman Sachs Files Patent for Cryptocurrency “SETLcoin” https://t.co/EeDEUQ1clv -> Pirate Site Trial in Norway Ends in Record Sentence https://t.co/jlbLFFHmQ4 -> North Carolina man sentenced to 3 years for criminal copyright infringement https://t.co/JFtTqJolo9 -> Capgemini launches identity as a service cyber security https://t.co/suOF4beUi6 -> US Court: With a… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(IP Tango) South Africa Brand bullies: IP and the SMEs - difficulties faced by small companies in defending trade mark infringement claims (Afro-IP) Avoiding the ambush: FIFA World Cup (Afro-IP) Switzerland JAVA MONSTER vulnerable and unprotected in Switzerland (Class 46) Uganda Uganda’s Copyright Regulations finally published! [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
v=XCbPFHu3OOc. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
It may not: Oracle won an important victory against Google when an U.S. appeals court decided Oracle could copyright parts of the Java programming language, which Google used to design its Android smartphone operating system - although use could still fall u [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
