Search for: "wildfires AND "clean air act"" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2013, 2:01 pm by WIMS
EPA can team up with the states and use the Clean Air Act to cut carbon pollution by 26 percent by 2020 from existing power plants [See WIMS 12/5/12]. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:17 am by admin
Congress’s delegation of regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act to EPA, not the extent of EPA’s specific regulatory actions on the issue, is what displaces the federal common law of nuisance. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:12 pm
In 2007, it ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency should regulate greenhouse gases under the Federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm by Pace Law School Library
Ignoring implementation costs of the Clean Air Act: a costly mistake. 7 J.L. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm by Joe Koncelik
EPA is moving forward with regulation of greenhouse gas emission under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
– Kevin Kerrigan, Pacific News Center, July 27, 2010 Guam – Mobil has agreed to pay a $2.4 million dollar civil penalty for violations of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Agrees to Pay $2.1 Million Penalty for Diesel Engine Clean Air Act Violations. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:59 pm by David Doniger
  The bill tailors some existing Clean Air Act provisions, but avoids overbroad changes in the House bill. [read post]
15 May 2009, 11:08 am
In short, we can take a big bite out of global warming pollution from cars, power plants, and other large sources using the Clean Air Act we have today, and we applaud EPA and the Obama administration for acting. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
The greenhouse gases that are responsible for it endanger public health and welfare within the meaning of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:28 am by Brian Dunkiel, Attorney
The Supreme Court ruled that carbon dioxide is an “air pollutant” subject to regulation by the Clean Air Act. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
At its core, the case is about the Clean Air Act: what the language of the Act means, and what Congress intended by that language. [read post]