Search for: "*reeves v. Reeves"
Results 381 - 400
of 669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 8:02 am
Reeves, 2012 WL 1072202 (Ga. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:42 am
” At Business Insider, Erin Fuchs previews next month’s argument in Holt v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:30 pm
In Reeves v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:13 am
According to Richard Plaistowe, an intellectual property lawyer at Mills & Reeve, a South African company called has registered "vuvuzela" as a Community trade mark, which covers the whole European Union. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm
Circuit opinion in Kim v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 10:37 am
Oman, "United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:47 am
The proposal was spurred in part by the case McLemore v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Reeves v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am
On December 8, 2017, the Court released two landmark judgments on this subject: R v Marakah[2] and R v Jones.[3] (Full disclosure: I was counsel to the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA), which intervened in both appeals.) [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Reeves (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Change of Child Custody Reversed in Crossville Post-Divorce Dispute: Garrett v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
District Judge Carlton Reeves presides in the case. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:38 am
I confess to being a bit surprised by how much interest it has generated as I can’t see that it says anything much that is “new”:(a) in domestic law, this wouldn’t (necessarily) have been a case about the Directive/Regulations at all; a clause like this is so obviously a penalty clause (i.e. not a genuine pre-estimate of loss) that it’d be unenforceable at common law;(b) there is already plenty of domestic authority for the proposition that the Directive/Regulations… [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:38 am
I confess to being a bit surprised by how much interest it has generated as I can’t see that it says anything much that is “new”:(a) in domestic law, this wouldn’t (necessarily) have been a case about the Directive/Regulations at all; a clause like this is so obviously a penalty clause (i.e. not a genuine pre-estimate of loss) that it’d be unenforceable at common law;(b) there is already plenty of domestic authority for the proposition that the Directive/Regulations… [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:13 am
However, in the recent Chancery decision of inTEAM Associates, LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:40 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Reeves v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 9:38 am
Reeves v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
Reeves, 362 F.3d 702, 723 (11th Cir.2004). [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:15 am
Reeves. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:56 pm
Reeve, 637 A.2d 879 (Md. [read post]
