Search for: "A & E Entertainment Inc "
Results 381 - 400
of 951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[vi] Chief Justice Warren E. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:23 am
GFA Brands, Inc., Opposition Nos. 912142477 et al. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. are relatively straightforward. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:59 pm
Marvel Entertainment, LLC: Royalty Payments After Term Patent ExpirationCHAPTER 3. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:03 am
This was communicated to them last week by e-mail and confirmed in person on Monday. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:03 am
This was communicated to them last week by e-mail and confirmed in person on Monday. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:17 pm
The press release (here), which relates to Web.com Group, Inc., refers to the company’s August 18, 2015 filing with the SEC on Form 8-K. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
, Inc., Serial No. 85696594 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of PREGNANCY TEXT for "Education and entertainment services, namely, providing audio, video, and prose presentations featuring a simulated pregnancy experience in mobile wireless form in both SMS and MMS formats"].September 30, 2015 - 2 PM: In re Santa Crux Toacco Co., Inc., Serial No. 77129912 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register GRAN HABANO for "cigars made from… [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 6:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals discussed the applicable test to determine whether unpaid internships are legal in lawsuits against Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc. and Fox Entertainment Group Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:59 am
Orgill, Inc., 2015 WL 4572296, No. 14-11818 (D. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:25 am
§ 20109(e)(3), “[r]elief in any action under subsection (d) may include punitive damages in an amount not to exceed $250,000. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
I gave my annual presentation today to the Toronto computer Lawyers’ Group on “The year in review in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law”. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:29 am
The CAFC affirmed the TTAB's decision (here) summarily dismissing pro se Appellant Joel E Beling's petition for cancellation of Respondent Ennis, Inc.'s registration for the mark COLORWORX & Design for printing services. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:54 am
Innocor, Inc. , Cancellation No. 92054201 [Petition for Cancellation of a registration for BODIPEDIC & Design for "mattress toppers, pillows, mattresses," on the ground of likely confusion with the registered mark TEMPUR-PEDIC & Reclining Figure Design for "seating and couching mats in the nature of a pillow or seat liner, pillows, cushions, mattresses, top mattresses, bolsters and chair pads"].June 23, 2015- 11 AM: In re Inovalon, Inc., Serial No.… [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
” Lockhart’s petition asks “whether § 2252(b)(2)’s mandatory minimum sentence is triggered by a prior conviction … that did not ‘involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
Data protection claims But what happens if the claim for an injunction is brought under the DP Directive/DPA, which, as stated above, specifically excludes the E-Commerce Directive, including the Article 15 anti-general monitoring provision? [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
Keep in mind, for each statement, that Eramo must (A) show it’s false, (B) show it tends to injures her reputation, (C) show it’s a factual assertion, and not a statement of opinion, (D) show reasonable readers would see it as being about her (the so-called “of and concerning” requirement, and (E) show, by clear and convincing evidence, that defendants knew it was likely false (my shorthand for the knowledge-or-reckless-disregard standard). [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
NEWEST ADDITION TO HECHT COURT'S IMMUNITY JURIS(MAL)PRUDENCE: DRUNK DRIVER IMMUNITY Here is yet another example of the Texas Supreme Court's penchant for creating and invoking immunity theories to deny plaintiffs their day in court against a party that caused injury, and thereby preventing a trial on the merits and recovery of damages from the tortfeasor proven to have committed the tort. [read post]
