Search for: "A Minor Boy v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:57 am by Susan Brenner
Charles Stokes was “charged with traveling in interstate and foreign commerce for the purpose of engaging in a sexual act with a minor” in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm by Mike
McCabe was a priest who allegedly assaulted a six boys between 1975 and 1981. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 3:47 am by SHG
Not if you look at many other valuable things he has done for minorities. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As a boy he was so badly scalded he had to miss a year of schooling. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:28 pm by James R. Marsh
Focusing first on the Supreme Court's 1986 decision in Bethel School District v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]