Search for: "A. B. A. v. Wood" Results 381 - 400 of 896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2017, 6:47 pm by Patricia Salkin
Clarksville Residents Against Mortuary Defense Fund, Inc v Donaldson Properties, 2017 WL 4103706 (MD 6/22/2017)Filed under: Special Use/Exception [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Code § 16(a)(1)(B) (authorizing immediate appeal of order denying motion to compel arbitration). [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm by INFORRM
In Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, the Court of Appeal accepted that the retention, by the police, of photographs of an activist constituted an actionable breach of the Article 8 right to privacy given the sinister overtures of state monitoring that this retention spoke to. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Adam Chandler
The New York Times profiles Judge Diane Wood, examining her Seventh Circuit record to predict what a Justice Wood would bring to the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the May 17, May 24, May 31 and June 7 conferences)   Wood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd, heard 7 February 2017. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by John Elwood
Connor and Plumhoff v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:37 am by Susan Brenner
Code § 13032(b)(1) [now codified in 18 U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
Circuit, and Judge Diane Wood of the Seventh Circuit – to replace Justice Stevens. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
The case in question is Case C‑383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Société Elmar Wolf, a piece of litigation that was kick-started seven and a half years ago when the predecessor of what is now Enviromental Manufacturing (let's just call them EM) applied to register as a Community trade mark a figurative sign representing a wolf’s head for 'machines for professional and industrial processing of wood… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 20, April 27, May 10, May 17, May 24, May 31, June 7, June 14 and June 21 conferences; apparently held pending approval of a settlement agreement)   Wood v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 10:39 pm
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Hydril Company, LP, et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
Most of my previous posts here about Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood have been devoted to the question of whether the plaintiffs have adequately alleged that federal law imposes a "substantial burden" on their exercise of religion--the threshold question under RFRA. [read post]