Search for: "A. J. B." Results 381 - 400 of 17,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Warby LJ, upholding this aspect of Nicklin J’s first instance judgment, answered emphatically that it is not: “the only question raised by section 3(3) of the 2013 Act is whether the statement complained of indicated the basis of the opinion which it contained [44]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm by Karen K. Hartford
Forms 1095-B/1095-C must be provided to employees by March 1, 2024, and the deadline for electronic transmittal of Forms 1094-B/1094-C to the IRS is April 1, 2024. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:25 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney David B. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
 1 wie folgt: «Zum Schutz der Lieferketten der Armee und der militärischen Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie sowie zur Erhaltung der Betriebskontinuität und der Resilienz gegenüber Bedrohungen, insbesondere im Cyberbereich, können die Militärverwaltung und die Armee mit Ausnahme von Funkfrequenzen: a. die Nutzung von Requisitionsgütern einschränken oder verbieten; b. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
Dec. 20, 2023 Savage, J.), the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled, in a property damage action pursued by a Plaintiff insurance company, that the Plaintiff’s request to serve a Defendant in an alternative manner by posting a copy of the Summons and the Complaint at its business premises would be denied.The court noted that, under F.R.C.P. 4(h)(1)(B), a corporation must be served “by delivering a copy of the Summons and of the Complaint… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:28 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
LLRX Articles and Columns for January 2024 The 2024 ‘Burning Issues’ Confronting Firm Leaders – Patrick J, Mckeena and Michael B. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
 le juge Beaupré: Même lorsque les 3 conditions d’application de la préclusion découlant d’une question déjà tranchée sont remplies, le juge conserve le pouvoir discrétionnaire de refuser d’en faire bénéficier le défendeur. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm by Mark Burridge
District Court for the Southern District of New York by Lyndon B. [read post]