Search for: "ACTAVIS"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2018, 9:58 pm
By Kevin E. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:05 pm
(Actavis bought Amide Pharmaceuticals in May of 2005.) [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:34 am
Actavis Group hf., et al., 2:09-cv-00768 Readers may recall that the federal Digitek product liability cases, alleging that Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Inc. and Actavis Elizabeth LLC released Digitek tablets containing more than the appropriate dosage to the public in 2008, were transferred to an MDL last August. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:21 am
Lilly argue direct infringement on the footing that, when properly construed Actavis’ products do fall within claim 1 of the patent, in view of the equivalence between pemetrexed disodium and the salt forms Actavis use. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:41 am
Prior to Actavis, nearly all appeals courts to examine reverse payment settlements concluded that they do not represent an antitrust concern. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
Actavis does not support expedition of the appeals, but Warner-Lambert does. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:09 am
The Actavis ./. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:29 am
However, both these conclusions were rejected by the Supreme Court which found direct infringement of the Italian designation of the patent by the Actavis variants. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Mr Justice Arnold foresees no infringing saline use in Actavis' pemetrexed futureIf you were at a loss as to what to get that special patent litigator in your life this Valentine's Day, look no further. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
Aaron S. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:24 pm
Actavis argued that plausibility meant that a patent provides a "reasonable prediction" that the invention will work based on the common general knowledge. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
It is a process claim since it concerns the preparation of the substance pregabalin, and it is a purpose-limited claim since it only covers the process if undertaken in order to treat neuropathic pain Although the Court unanimously holds that if Claims 1 and 3 had been valid, they would not have been infringed by Actavis, the justification of the ruling differs substantially between the Lords .Warner-Lambert pursued its infringement case under section 60(1)(c) and separately, under… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:18 am
Digitek, also known as digitalis or digoxin, is a prescription drug that was recalled from the market in April of 2008 by manufacturers Actavis Totowa, LLC; Actavis, Inc.; Actavis US; Mylan, Inc.; Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Mylan Laboratories, Inc.; Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals; and UDL Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
The Little Falls, New Jersey plant where Digitek was manufactured by Actavis Totowa now stands empty after the massive Digitek recall in April of 2008, and a subsequent investigation that noted irregularities in the manufacture of more than 60 other products by Actavis Totowa at that plant, including cardiac, pain, diet, and psychiatric medications. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:08 pm
The Little Falls, New Jersey plant where Digitek was manufactured by Actavis Totowa now stands empty after the massive Digitek recall in April of 2008, and a subsequent investigation that noted irregularities in the manufacture of more than 60 other products by Actavis Totowa at that plant, including cardiac, pain, diet, and psychiatric medications. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
Recent cases such as Trunki and Actavis v Eli Lilly in the Supreme Court and the CJEU ruling in Specsavers have drawn into focus the relationship between the representation contained on the patent, trade mark and design registers and the scope of protection conferred by those registrations. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:12 am
In the meantime, here they are in outline:Case C‑443/12, Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd v Sanofi, Sanofi Pharma Bristol-Myers Squibb SNC intervening, noted on The SPC Blog here. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
In a long awaited decision by the UK Supreme Court, the matter was (finally) put to bed, at least in the UK.The case of Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation concerned a dosage patent owned by ICOS (EP1173181), which related to the use of tadalafil (more commonly known as Cialis) in a dosage form for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
In a long awaited decision by the UK Supreme Court, the matter was (finally) put to bed, at least in the UK.The case of Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation concerned a dosage patent owned by ICOS (EP1173181), which related to the use of tadalafil (more commonly known as Cialis) in a dosage form for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:48 am
The dust has started to settle following the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 handed down recently (IPKat post here). [read post]
