Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
Circuit32133.3%Federal Circuit42250.0%Armed Forces0000%State Court112982.0%U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
Circuit32133.3%Federal Circuit42250.0%Armed Forces0000%State Court112982.0%U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 1:05 pm
Moreover, we know from Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust (1999) UKHL 26; (2000) 1 AC 406 that it is perfectly possible for a landlord to grant a tenancy that exceeds their own interest in the property, so it would not be necessary for WHC to have a lease of the property to be the landlord. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
In particular, the court considered the deemed lawful taking of photographs by police officers as in R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 and R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers [2015] AC 1065. [read post]
From Platforms to Workflows: Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey – Fall 2019 Results
5 Sep 2019, 2:42 pm
Initiated in the fall of 2018 and refreshed semi-annually, this iteration of the survey was graciously distributed and reviewed by the leadership team* at the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) and had the highest responder rate of any predictive coding survey to date with 100 data and legal discovery professionals sharing their understanding and experience as part of the four question survey. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396. [2] Campus Oil v Minister for Industry [1983] IR 38. [3] Okunade v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am
Ms A argued that this extended to s.204 appeals, citing Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC (2003) 2 AC 430 on the kinship of s.204 appeals and judicial review. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
ACS directly placed the child in the home of his paternal aunt. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm
Suffice it to say at this juncture that the law is settled in this area: the Supreme Court having reconsidered the requirement that all tenancies must be for a term certain, and giving the rule renewed (if, it must be said, grudging) approval in Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford(2012) 1 AC 955. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
See, e.g., Gamble v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 11:22 am
Owners of Oregon v. [read post]
