Search for: "Adoption of L. J." Results 381 - 400 of 2,451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Elle a donc agi à l’intérieur de sa compétence lorsqu’elle a adopté le règlement 2326. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
[Closing out Week Two of our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a contribution from a very special guest: Commissioner Noah J. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[I blogged an early draft of this essay three months ago, but I've revised it extensively since then. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 11:16 pm by David Kopel
As noted above, Americans were much quicker to adopt flintlocks than were their British cousins. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
Then, in 2005, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) adopted a similar dissemination tool for munis. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:14 am by Matthias Weller
 74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Texas has been leading the charge in these wars, adopting policies that neither comply with the federal Constitution nor enjoy support from a majority of its residents. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 8:15 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Expansion of premium processing service to Form I-539 change of status to F-1, F-2, J-1, J-2, M-1, or M-2 NIV status, or change of status to or extension of stay in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-4, L-2, O-3, P-4, R-2 NIV status. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 6:13 am by Carl Trudeau
En effet, pour les employeurs faisant partie des groupes prioritaires 1, 2 et 3, de l’Annexe I du Règlement sur le programme de prévention[2], l’obligation est maintenue en ce qui concerne ladoption d’un programme de prévention. [read post]