Search for: "Advance ER"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 8:53 am
Application/Petition Description Existing Fees (effective through Nov. 22, 2010 Adjusted Fees (effective beginning Nov. 23, 2010) I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card $290 $365 I-102 Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure Document $320 $330 I-129/129CW Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker $320 $325 I-129F Petition for Alien Fiancé(e) $455 $340 I-130 Petition for Alien Relative $355 $420 I-131 Application for Travel Document $305 $360 … [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:37 pm
Application/Petition Description Existing Fees (effective through Nov. 22, 2010 Adjusted Fees (effective beginning Nov. 23, 2010) I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card $290 $365 I-102 Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure Document $320 $330 I-129/129CW Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker $320 $325 I-129F Petition for Alien Fiancé(e) $455 $340 I-130 Petition for Alien Relative $355 $420 I-131 Application for Travel Document $305 $360 … [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:20 pm
From the opinion: Shafer contends that the district court erred when it imposed the two-level enhancement pursuant to § 2G2.1(b)(2)(A) because: (1) "sexual contact" does not include self-masturbation and (2) Shafer did not commit any "sexual contact" that can be considered "relevant conduct" for purposes of the enhancement. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:04 pm
I have been told that there is generational strife between baby boomers in law firm management that were brought up to be loyal and Gen X and Y'ers who have no sense of loyalty whatsoever. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:16 am
But there is more below the foldAnyway, an ineffective assistance argument, advanced for the first time on appeal is rejected. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 10:01 am
Safely, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) that regulation which impinges on inmates' constitutional rights is valid if reasonably related to valid penological interests cannot be used to validate funding violations of the Establishment Clause; district court erred in ordering defendants to return funds received under the programs; provisions of the injunction concerning further funding of the program were not overbroad and did not forever ban the defendants from operating in Iowa. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 11:45 am
Roberts noted that all other claims under the Bill of Rights may be brought this way, and thus the Williamson County court erred in holding otherwise. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:41 am
After your opponents submissions explain where they have clearly erred. 9. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:30 am
Christopher Measom filed a lawsuit against his coop -- Greenwich & Perry Street Housing Corporation -- alleging breach of his proprietary lease.In a prior appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, had determined that Measom's cellar apartment was not legally habitable for residential purposes and that he was entitled to damages.On remand, the Supreme Court transferred the case to the New York County Civil Court, which awarded Measom $77,000, together with… [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 10:39 am
The University’s project includes the construction of an advanced technology solar telescope and associated infrastructure. [read post]
22 May 2009, 10:21 pm
Miller's was funded by the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency in 2002 and 2003. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:22 pm
[He] aggressively and rapidly advanced...with clenched fists, piercing eyes, beet-red face, popping veins, and screaming and swearing. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:16 am
Garaufis erred in his 2015 decision in favor of the DOJ. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 5:16 pm
” Anyone can opt out in advance online. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:50 pm
In essence, defendant/appellant Wyeth is advancing two arguments in its appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
Finally, plaintiff contends that the Orloff court erred in concluding that UNO’s operation was illegal. [read post]
16 Sep 2006, 4:39 pm
The court also held that the verdict did not include certain amounts the employer had advanced to the employee prior to trial, including a new, wheelchair-accessible, mortgage-free home, a wheelchair-accessible van, and home-exercise equipment, which mitigated some pain and suffering that would have otherwise occurred. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:36 pm
In the absence of direction from Congress stronger than any Arrow has advanced, we apply the familiar default rule: Federal courts have § 1331 jurisdiction over claims that arise under federal law. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 11:43 am
They concluded that the district court had erred in their ruling and allowed the case to move forward for trial. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
The Federal Circuit erred in concluding that all Cohill remands are subject matter jurisdictional. [read post]
