Search for: "All Property Services Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 5,769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
  This list does not attempt to include all important decisions of those two courts that were rendered in 2022. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 8:05 am by Andrew D. Kasnevich
Uber Techs., Inc., 868 F.3d 66 at 75 (2d Cir. 2017) (“Courts routinely uphold clickwrap agreements for the principal reason that the Account Holder has affirmatively assented to the terms of agreement by clicking ‘I agree. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by Patricia Salkin
Finally, the court denied summary judgment on all RLUIPA claims as there was a factual dispute as to whether the Islamic Center had a sufficient property interest under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act statute to proceed. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 11:24 pm by Chris Manes
The regulations don’t provide guidance on what constitutes “short-term” or “long-term,” but case law suggests anything over nine months is problematic, and audit practice indicates that nine-month periods back-to-back over a number of tax years is all but dispositive that the purpose is not temporary or transitory. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
AI seems to be (machine) learning and doing it all—perhaps, it has taken a step even further to play a little on the human psyche and create “magic avatars” envisaging who one may want to be. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
-Elect Hobbs Refuses to Disclose Donors to Inaugural Party Arizona Daily Star – Bob Christie (Capitol Media Services) | Published: 1/1/2023 Arizona Gov. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:46 am by Eric Goldman
” The statute defines merchants as any retailers (not just restaurants), so this statute seems to give all retailers categorical control over third-party pickup/delivery services? [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:04 pm by Arkady Itkin
However, recently one California Court of Appeal noted in Espinoza v Warehouse Demo Services, Inc. (2022) that the relevant inquiry as to whether an employee works away from the employer’s place of business is not whether the employer owns or controls the work site, but the extent to which the employer maintains control or supervision over the employee’s hours and working conditions. [read post]