Search for: "Am. Federation of State, Etc. v. State, Etc."
Results 381 - 400
of 589
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2012, 3:08 pm
First, white women benefit significantly from state and federal affirmative-action programs (in higher education, small business loans, government contracts, etc.) and in the private sector with hiring and recent efforts to diversify boards of Fortune 500 companies. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:55 am
(Note: I am not addressing the specific claims in the case USA v Amawi) Q: One last observation& [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Additionally, this tally pertains only to books (as opposed to separately printed reports, opinions, articles, etc.) published during the Justices’ lifetimes. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
” In several speeches I’ve listened to, he states: I am not a strict constructionist. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:24 pm
First, this seems largely silly because almost any irrevocable trust will have to file a federal and state tax returns. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:57 am
Regards, Roy] Quirky Question # 189: I am the Human Resources Director at a mid-size company, with employees in eight states. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
§ 1983 as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, which permitted the filing civil tort suits against State governments that violated federal rights. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:59 pm
Nearly all the technical pleading requirements are found in Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 420-475 in state practice and in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rules 7-15 for federal practice. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:59 pm
Nearly all the technical pleading requirements are found in Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 420-475 in state practice and in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rules 7-15 for federal practice. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm
Am. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:20 pm
The state law claims certainly seem plausible; theft, assault(ish), etc. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:31 am
Federal Ins. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
I am going to try to meet some of your particular and sophisticated interests by building upon rather than merely restating what I told the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Law and National Security early last month in Washington. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
bas Klubs v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
I am rather fond of them. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm
Just like the personal exemptions, standard deduction, FICA limit, etc. are always adjusted for economic reality – every other number that also affects tax thresholds and calculations should be adjusted. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
The concept of preemption rears its head in this early case, as one of the defendant's arguments was that the State Pure Food Statute interfered with federal acts and regulations. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
It’s not retaliation against him, though, because he claims the address actually belongs to a “United States Judge” (by which he means a state judge, even though any lawyer would interpret that as a reference to a federal judge), and that I am PUTTING A JUDGE IN DANGER. [read post]
