Search for: "Application of Floyd" Results 381 - 400 of 607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Rather, its significance lies in the application of the law to the facts. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
Obviousness and common general knowledge are features of patent law that are of very limited application, if any at all, in most other areas of intellectual property. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 7:46 pm
Like the first instance judge, Floyd LJ was able to draw the necessary conclusions about the construction of the claim on the basis of the specification of the patent. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
This supports the approach adopted in Sara Lee and DataCard: see Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd [2008] EWHC 1379 (Pat), [2009] FSR 1 at [205]-[211] (Floyd J, as he then was).106. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:52 am by SHG
Floyd sought her concealed carry permit, and the application included a box that asked “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana? [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
Writing for a unanimous panel, Judge Floyd held that the record was insufficiently clear on the allocation of decisional responsibility as between the PMCs and the military to ascertain whether the political question doctrine or derivative sovereign immunity should bar the action, and that, to similar effect, the record was insufficiently clear about whether “the military retain[ed] command authority” over KBR’s waste management and water treatment activities sufficient to… [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
The application for EP375 was filed by Unilever on 12 June 1985 with Professor Shanks and two other inventors claiming priority from two UK patent applications of which Professor Shanks was the sole inventor -- 8414018 (for an Electrochemical Capillary Fill Device (ECFD)) and 8415019 (for an Fluorescent Electrochemical Capillary Fill Device (FCFD)). [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
 The Judge in this case concluded that programming a computer to do something “is the equivalent of the  physical modification of Floyd J’s example”. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm by Florian Mueller
And that's why I, despite having founded and run a campaign against software patents, am currently working on my own first patent application because I want to protect the key differentiating feature of the app I'm working on. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
 First instance judge (Floyd J) finds patents invalid (see decisions here and here). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  And now, the recent iPhone and iPad news of note: Florida attorney Katie Floyd reviews Calendar Paste, an app that lets you work with calendar entry templates. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
  The court was told that Mr Lilley had sought permission to appeal this order but was refused by a decision of Floyd LJ. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:28 am
Application of the less-restrictive limited-public-forum analysis better accounts for the fact that Hastings, through its [Registered Student Organization] program, is dangling the carrot of subsidy, not wielding the stick of prohibition. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:47 am
Is there a clear and ambiguous disclosure in the application of PSBs asymmetric about the lateral axis of the caliper body? [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 10:08 am
If that evidence to be called was not enough for Zee Entertainment to win its case, it was unlikely that the survey evidence it sought to adduce in this application would make any difference. [read post]