Search for: "B. R."
Results 381 - 400
of 56,237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 2:45 am
Der Eidgenössische Datenschutz- und Öffentlichkeitsbeauftragte (EDÖB) hat nun einen entsprechenden Online-Fragebogen veröffentlicht: Mit Dutzenden von Fragen wird geprüft, ob, und falls ja, welche Risiken bei einem Projekt zur Bearbeitung von Personendaten vorhanden sind. [read post]
20 May 2008, 8:28 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Flynn & Anor, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 970 (02 May 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B v B [2008] EWCA Civ 483 (12 May 2008) G, R (on the application of) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2008] EWCA Civ 1096 (20 May 2008) W (Children) [2008] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2008) TH v RB [2008] EWCA Civ 539 (20 May 2008) SB v County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 535 (20 May 2008) Romantiek Transport BVba & Ors v Vehicle and… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
While Article 50-B of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) is most commonly associated with the payment of damages in personal injury and wrongful death actions, the title of the statute... [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 10:05 am
Reuters has reported that during last week's Moscow Air Show (MAKS 2007) a wealthy Russian tried to buy a B-52 bomber from he U.S. delegation. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:08 pm
We are extremely proud to announce that our own Ada B. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:08 am
A blanket objection to a USMJ R&R in a search claim is unavailing; the objecting party has to be specific as to the objections. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
R v Mitchell (Northern Ireland), heard 7 July 2016. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:59 pm
The latest issue of Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen (Vol. 24, no. 2, 2017) is out. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:51 pm
Bottar, Esq., a Syracuse medical malpractice lawyer representing newborns injured by a failure to diagnose group B strep or GBS misdiagnosis. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:27 pm
Eva Maria Belser, Alexandra Fang-Bär, Nina Massüger, & Rekha Oleschak Pillai have published States Falling Apart? [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
R. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
N TELEFON B? [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:51 pm
Arctic Arms 907-770-7502 Arctic Custom Services 907-376-0703 Arms and Equipment 907-479-4867 B&B Firearms 907-333-9461 R&M Sporting Goods 907-357-9711 If you are a Class 3 dealer or know of other Alaska Class 3 dealers let us know. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:08 pm
O ministro-revisor da Ação Penal (AP) 470, Ricardo Lewandowski, votou pela absolvição dos réus Marcos Valério, Ramon Hollerbach e Cristiano Paz nos crimes de corrupção ativa e peculato, imputados pelo Ministério Publico Federal quanto à acusação de oferecer a quantia de R$ 50 mil ao deputado federal João Paulo Cunha em troca de suposta obtenção de vantagens para sua… [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 7:03 am
İnternetin en büyük sitelerinden biri hızla kan kaybediyor. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision contains an interesting paragraph dealing with the emotional style of the petition, and possible consequences as to its admissibility.[4] It appears to the EBA that the petition was filed within two months of notification of the decision in question, that the petitioner was adversely affected thereby, that the prescribed fee has been paid in time, and that the petition complies with R 107(1)(b).[5] As regards R 106, the EBA notes that the petitioner argued, as… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:35 am
Tisha B'Av went down in ignominy in my little square of the world when, a few years ago, I wished one of my best friends, who happens to be a very devout Conservative Jew, a "Happy Tisha B'Av day. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:17 am
Because FDIC–R has not shown that access to the Westernbank data is hindered by any unique technological hurdles, it has failed to trigger Rule 26(b)(2)(B). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:08 am
Weil "LABSPACE" für diese Dienstleistungen im Bereich "Laborräume" unzulässig ist, muss es auch für die entsprechenden Oberbegriffe zurückgewiesen werden (ständige Rechtsprechung). [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
However, the EBA does not need to further examine this question because the decision deals with the arguments which the appellant has actually raised (i.e. points A and B). [read post]
